Add linux-riscv64 as a cross-compilation target - #105
Conversation
…026.08.13.08.26.4
…026.08.13.08.26.46 Other tools: - conda-build 26.7.0 - rattler-build 0.72.2 - rattler-build-conda-compat 1.4.19
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( I do have some suggestions for making it better though... For recipe/recipe.yaml:
This message was generated by GitHub Actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-webservices/actions/runs/31819348548. Examine the logs at this URL for more detail. |
…026.08.13.08.26.46 Other tools: - conda-build 26.7.0 - rattler-build 0.72.2 - rattler-build-conda-compat 1.4.19
…026.08.13.08.26.46 Other tools: - conda-build 26.7.0 - rattler-build 0.72.2 - rattler-build-conda-compat 1.4.19
|
@conda-forge/cross-python this passes all CI and should be good to go. It supersedes #104. PTAL, thank you! :) |
No, it doesn't, at least not without coordination. It's fair to pick up long-dead PRs, or anything from the bot, but don't take a PR from an active contributor and then claim yours supersedes it (unless that contributor tell you to go ahead after being somehow not in a position to make your suggested changes themselves, or at least as quickly as you). Also, if you do pick up any other PR, please give it a different title. It gets very confusing to receive notifications from different PRs on the same feedstock that only differ in the PR number. I usually use |
I'm sorry, I indeed shouldn't have, my bad. I will submit the |
Checklist
0(if the version changed)conda-smithy(Use the phrase@conda-forge-admin, please rerenderin a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)